Sri Lanka vs Uruguay: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Uruguay rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0374 people per person | 0.0027 people per person | 0.0347 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0141 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | 0.0134 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Sri Lanka or Uruguay?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 0 people per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Uruguay rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 103rd and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.