Samoa vs Tonga: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Samoa
0.0007 people per person
in 2024
Tonga
0.0006 people per person
in 2024
Samoa rank
92nd
Tonga rank
93rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Samoa
- Tonga
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0.0007 people per person against 0.0006 people per person in Tonga, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tonga ahead.
Samoa ranks 92nd and Tonga ranks 93rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0009 people per person | 0.0016 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | Tonga |
| 2010s | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | Tonga |
| 2020s | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | 0 people per person | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Samoa or Tonga?
- Samoa, at 0.0007 people per person against 0.0006 people per person in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Samoa and Tonga?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Tonga?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Tonga rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Samoa ranks 92nd and Tonga ranks 93rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.