Peru vs Suriname: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Peru
0.0151 people per person
in 2024
Suriname
0.0109 people per person
in 2024
Peru rank
65th
Suriname rank
67th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Peru
- Suriname
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0151 people per person against 0.0109 people per person in Suriname, a difference of 0.0042 people per person.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 65th and Suriname ranks 67th of 171 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1043 people per person | 0.0683 people per person | 0.036 people per person | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.0543 people per person | 0.0316 people per person | 0.0227 people per person | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.0229 people per person | 0.0109 people per person | 0.0119 people per person | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Peru or Suriname?
- Peru, at 0.0151 people per person against 0.0109 people per person in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Peru and Suriname?
- 0.0042 people per person, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Peru and Suriname rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Peru ranks 65th and Suriname ranks 67th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.