Oman vs South Africa: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Oman
0 people per person
in 2024
South Africa
0 people per person
in 2024
Oman rank
103rd
South Africa rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Oman
- South Africa
How they compare
Oman currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 24 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Oman ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0292 people per person | 0.0725 people per person | 0.0433 people per person | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.0029 people per person | 0.028 people per person | 0.0251 people per person | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0018 people per person | 0.0018 people per person | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Oman or South Africa?
- Oman, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Oman and South Africa?
- 0 people per person, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and South Africa?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Oman and South Africa rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Oman ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.