Nepal vs South Africa: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Nepal
0 people per person
in 2024
South Africa
0 people per person
in 2024
Nepal rank
103rd
South Africa rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Nepal
- South Africa
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5241 people per person | 0.0752 people per person | 0.4489 people per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.2451 people per person | 0.028 people per person | 0.2171 people per person | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.0491 people per person | 0.0018 people per person | 0.0473 people per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Nepal or South Africa?
- Nepal, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Nepal and South Africa?
- 0 people per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and South Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and South Africa rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Nepal ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.