Morocco vs Nepal: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Morocco
0 people per person
in 2024
Nepal
0 people per person
in 2024
Morocco rank
103rd
Nepal rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Morocco
- Nepal
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Morocco ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1687 people per person | 0.5241 people per person | 0.3554 people per person | Nepal |
| 2010s | 0.0639 people per person | 0.2451 people per person | 0.1812 people per person | Nepal |
| 2020s | 0.0041 people per person | 0.0491 people per person | 0.045 people per person | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Morocco or Nepal?
- Morocco, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Morocco and Nepal?
- 0 people per person, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Morocco and Nepal rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Morocco ranks 103rd and Nepal ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.