Laos vs Pakistan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Laos
0.0873 people per person
in 2024
Pakistan
0.0799 people per person
in 2024
Laos rank
32nd
Pakistan rank
33rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Laos
- Pakistan
How they compare
Laos currently reports 0.0873 people per person against 0.0799 people per person in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0074 people per person.
That makes Laos's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 32nd and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4582 people per person | 0.2597 people per person | 0.1986 people per person | Laos |
| 2010s | 0.253 people per person | 0.1679 people per person | 0.0851 people per person | Laos |
| 2020s | 0.1201 people per person | 0.0981 people per person | 0.022 people per person | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Laos or Pakistan?
- Laos, at 0.0873 people per person against 0.0799 people per person in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Laos and Pakistan?
- 0.0074 people per person, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Pakistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Laos and Pakistan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Laos ranks 32nd and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.