Kazakhstan vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Vietnam
0 people per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
103rd
Vietnam rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.1187 people per person | 0.1184 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0473 people per person | 0.047 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.004 people per person | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Kazakhstan or Vietnam?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Kazakhstan and Vietnam?
- 0 people per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Vietnam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 103rd and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.