Jordan vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Vietnam
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
101st
Vietnam rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Vietnam
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Vietnam ahead.
Jordan ranks 101st and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.1187 people per person | 0.1168 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0473 people per person | 0.0467 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.0038 people per person | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Jordan or Vietnam?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Jordan and Vietnam?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Vietnam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.