Jordan vs Uruguay: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
101st
Uruguay rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uruguay ahead.
Jordan ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0027 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0007 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Jordan or Uruguay?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Jordan and Uruguay?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Uruguay rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Uruguay ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.