Jordan vs Tunisia: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
101st
Tunisia rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Tunisia
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Jordan ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0633 people per person | 0.0614 people per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0209 people per person | 0.0203 people per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Jordan or Tunisia?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Jordan and Tunisia?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tunisia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Tunisia rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.