Jordan vs Kyrgyzstan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan rank
101st
Kyrgyzstan rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Jordan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 101st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0016 people per person | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | 0.0005 people per person | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.0002 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Jordan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Jordan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jordan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Jordan ranks 101st and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.