Iraq vs South Africa: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Iraq
0 people per person
in 2024
South Africa
0 people per person
in 2024
Iraq rank
103rd
South Africa rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Iraq
- South Africa
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0331 people per person | 0.0752 people per person | 0.0422 people per person | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.0061 people per person | 0.028 people per person | 0.0219 people per person | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0018 people per person | 0.0018 people per person | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Iraq or South Africa?
- Iraq, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Iraq and South Africa?
- 0 people per person, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and South Africa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and South Africa rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Iraq ranks 103rd and South Africa ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.