Haiti vs Zimbabwe: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Haiti
0.1269 people per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.1263 people per person
in 2024
Haiti rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
27th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Haiti
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 0.1269 people per person against 0.1263 people per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0006 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 171 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2753 people per person | 0.2891 people per person | 0.0138 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1754 people per person | 0.2091 people per person | 0.0337 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1309 people per person | 0.1487 people per person | 0.0178 people per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Haiti or Zimbabwe?
- Haiti, at 0.1269 people per person against 0.1263 people per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0006 people per person, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Haiti and Zimbabwe rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Haiti ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.