Guyana vs Kyrgyzstan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Guyana
0 people per person
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Guyana rank
103rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Guyana
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0103 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.01 people per person | Guyana |
| 2010s | 0.0059 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | 0.0057 people per person | Guyana |
| 2020s | 0.0012 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0012 people per person | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Guyana or Kyrgyzstan?
- Guyana, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Guyana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 people per person, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Kyrgyzstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guyana and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Guyana ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.