Guatemala vs Iran: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Guatemala
0.0065 people per person
in 2024
Iran
0.0037 people per person
in 2016
Guatemala rank
74th
Iran rank
77th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Iran
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 0.0065 people per person against 0.0037 people per person in Iran, a difference of 0.0028 people per person.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.7 times Iran's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 74th and Iran ranks 77th of 171 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Iran | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0917 people per person | 0.0047 people per person | 0.087 people per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.0523 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.0483 people per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Guatemala or Iran?
- Guatemala, at 0.0065 people per person against 0.0037 people per person in Iran as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Guatemala and Iran?
- 0.0028 people per person, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Iran?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Guatemala and Iran rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 74th and Iran ranks 77th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.