Ghana vs Zimbabwe: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Ghana
0.1235 people per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.1263 people per person
in 2024
Ghana rank
28th
Zimbabwe rank
27th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1263 people per person against 0.1235 people per person in Ghana, a difference of 0.0028 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 171 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.161 people per person | 0.2891 people per person | 0.1281 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.1414 people per person | 0.2091 people per person | 0.0677 people per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.1271 people per person | 0.1442 people per person | 0.0171 people per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Ghana or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.1263 people per person against 0.1235 people per person in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0028 people per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Zimbabwe rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Ghana ranks 28th and Zimbabwe ranks 27th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.