Georgia vs Oman: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Georgia
0 people per person
in 2024
Oman
0 people per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
103rd
Oman rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Oman
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Oman, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Oman ahead.
Georgia ranks 103rd and Oman ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0072 people per person | 0.0292 people per person | 0.022 people per person | Oman |
| 2010s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0029 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | Oman |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | 0 people per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Georgia or Oman?
- Georgia, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Georgia and Oman?
- 0 people per person, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oman?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Oman rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 103rd and Oman ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.