Georgia vs Jordan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Georgia
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Georgia rank
103rd
Jordan rank
101st
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Georgia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Georgia, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0074 people per person | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0055 people per person | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0014 people per person | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Georgia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Georgia and Jordan?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Jordan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Georgia ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.