Gambia vs Sri Lanka: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Gambia
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
103rd
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0366 people per person | 0.0374 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0132 people per person | 0.0141 people per person | 0.001 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0006 people per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Gambia or Sri Lanka?
- Gambia, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Gambia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 people per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Sri Lanka rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.