Gambia vs Jordan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Gambia
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
103rd
Jordan rank
101st
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Gambia
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Gambia, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0366 people per person | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0347 people per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0.0132 people per person | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0126 people per person | Gambia |
| 2020s | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0006 people per person | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Gambia or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Gambia and Jordan?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Jordan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Gambia ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.