Ecuador vs Zambia: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Ecuador
0.0171 people per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.0173 people per person
in 2024
Ecuador rank
62nd
Zambia rank
60th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Ecuador
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 0.0173 people per person against 0.0171 people per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0002 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 62nd and Zambia ranks 60th of 171 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.077 people per person | 0.2289 people per person | 0.1519 people per person | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0.045 people per person | 0.1129 people per person | 0.0679 people per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 0.0228 people per person | 0.0361 people per person | 0.0132 people per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Ecuador or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 0.0173 people per person against 0.0171 people per person in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Ecuador and Zambia?
- 0.0002 people per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Zambia rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Ecuador ranks 62nd and Zambia ranks 60th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.