Cuba vs Samoa: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Cuba
0.001 people per person
in 2024
Samoa
0.0007 people per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
90th
Samoa rank
92nd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Samoa
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.001 people per person against 0.0007 people per person in Samoa, a difference of 0.0003 people per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Samoa's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0086 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | 0.0077 people per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.0039 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0031 people per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0004 people per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Cuba or Samoa?
- Cuba, at 0.001 people per person against 0.0007 people per person in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Cuba and Samoa?
- 0.0003 people per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Samoa?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Samoa rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 92nd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.