China vs Sri Lanka: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
China
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
China rank
103rd
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- China
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
China currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0191 people per person | 0.0374 people per person | 0.0182 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0064 people per person | 0.0141 people per person | 0.0078 people per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, China or Sri Lanka?
- China, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between China and Sri Lanka?
- 0 people per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do China and Sri Lanka rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- China ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.