China vs Kazakhstan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
China
0 people per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 people per person
in 2024
China rank
103rd
Kazakhstan rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Kazakhstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0191 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0188 people per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0064 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.006 people per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0003 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, China or Kazakhstan?
- China, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between China and Kazakhstan?
- 0 people per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kazakhstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do China and Kazakhstan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- China ranks 103rd and Kazakhstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.