China vs Jordan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
China
0 people per person
in 2024
Jordan
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
China rank
103rd
Jordan rank
101st
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- China
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in China, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China ahead.
China ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0191 people per person | 0.0019 people per person | 0.0172 people per person | China |
| 2010s | 0.0064 people per person | 0.0006 people per person | 0.0058 people per person | China |
| 2020s | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, China or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between China and Jordan?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jordan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do China and Jordan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- China ranks 103rd and Jordan ranks 101st of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.