Chile vs Tunisia: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Chile
0 people per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 people per person
in 2024
Chile rank
103rd
Tunisia rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Chile
- Tunisia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Tunisia, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Tunisia ahead.
Chile ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0033 people per person | 0.0633 people per person | 0.06 people per person | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0.0039 people per person | 0.0209 people per person | 0.017 people per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0.0008 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Chile or Tunisia?
- Chile, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Chile and Tunisia?
- 0 people per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tunisia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Tunisia rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Chile ranks 103rd and Tunisia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.