Chile vs Eswatini: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Chile
0 people per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 people per person
in 2024
Chile rank
103rd
Eswatini rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Chile
- Eswatini
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 103rd and Eswatini ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0033 people per person | 0.1736 people per person | 0.1702 people per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0039 people per person | 0.0736 people per person | 0.0697 people per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0058 people per person | 0.0049 people per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Chile or Eswatini?
- Chile, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Chile and Eswatini?
- 0 people per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Eswatini rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Chile ranks 103rd and Eswatini ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.