Chad vs Eritrea: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Chad
0.5843 people per person
in 2024
Eritrea
0.5423 people per person
in 2016
Chad rank
3rd
Eritrea rank
4th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Chad
- Eritrea
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0.5843 people per person against 0.5423 people per person in Eritrea, a difference of 0.042 people per person.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eritrea ahead.
Chad ranks 3rd and Eritrea ranks 4th of 171 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.6586 people per person | 0.6556 people per person | 0.003 people per person | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.6279 people per person | 0.5607 people per person | 0.0672 people per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Chad or Eritrea?
- Chad, at 0.5843 people per person against 0.5423 people per person in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Chad and Eritrea?
- 0.042 people per person, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Eritrea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
- How do Chad and Eritrea rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Chad ranks 3rd and Eritrea ranks 4th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.