Brazil vs Gambia: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
Gambia
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
103rd
Gambia rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Gambia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Gambia, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 103rd and Gambia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0475 people per person | 0.0366 people per person | 0.0109 people per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.017 people per person | 0.0132 people per person | 0.0038 people per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0004 people per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Brazil or Gambia?
- Brazil, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Gambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Brazil and Gambia?
- 0 people per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Gambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Gambia rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 103rd and Gambia ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.