Brazil vs China: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
China
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
103rd
China rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Brazil
- China
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in China, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 103rd and China ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0475 people per person | 0.0191 people per person | 0.0284 people per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.017 people per person | 0.0064 people per person | 0.0106 people per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Brazil or China?
- Brazil, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in China as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Brazil and China?
- 0 people per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and China rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 103rd and China ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.