Bhutan vs Sri Lanka: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Bhutan
0 people per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 people per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
103rd
Sri Lanka rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0648 people per person | 0.0374 people per person | 0.0275 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0236 people per person | 0.0141 people per person | 0.0095 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0002 people per person | 0.0009 people per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Bhutan or Sri Lanka?
- Bhutan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 0 people per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Sri Lanka rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 103rd and Sri Lanka ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.