Bhutan vs Kyrgyzstan: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Bhutan
0 people per person
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
0 people per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
103rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0648 people per person | 0.0003 people per person | 0.0646 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0236 people per person | 0.0001 people per person | 0.0235 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0 people per person | 0.0011 people per person | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Bhutan or Kyrgyzstan?
- Bhutan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Bhutan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0 people per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Kyrgyzstan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 103rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.