Bhutan vs Brazil: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Bhutan
0 people per person
in 2024
Brazil
0 people per person
in 2024
Bhutan rank
103rd
Brazil rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Bhutan
- Brazil
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 103rd and Brazil ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Brazil in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0648 people per person | 0.0475 people per person | 0.0173 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 0.0236 people per person | 0.017 people per person | 0.0066 people per person | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 0.0011 people per person | 0.0011 people per person | 0 people per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Bhutan or Brazil?
- Bhutan, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Bhutan and Brazil?
- 0 people per person, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Brazil?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Brazil rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Bhutan ranks 103rd and Brazil ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.