Bangladesh vs Eswatini: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Bangladesh
0 people per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 people per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
103rd
Eswatini rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Eswatini
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 people per person.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 103rd and Eswatini ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1101 people per person | 0.1736 people per person | 0.0634 people per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0.0347 people per person | 0.0736 people per person | 0.0388 people per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0058 people per person | 0.0058 people per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Bangladesh or Eswatini?
- Bangladesh, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Bangladesh and Eswatini?
- 0 people per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Eswatini?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Eswatini rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 103rd and Eswatini ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.