Bangladesh vs Chile: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Bangladesh
0 people per person
in 2024
Chile
0 people per person
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
103rd
Chile rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Bangladesh
- Chile
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Chile, a difference of 0 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 103rd and Chile ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1101 people per person | 0.0033 people per person | 0.1068 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 0.0347 people per person | 0.0039 people per person | 0.0308 people per person | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 0 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | 0.0008 people per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Bangladesh or Chile?
- Bangladesh, at 0 people per person against 0 people per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Bangladesh and Chile?
- 0 people per person, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Chile?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Chile rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Bangladesh ranks 103rd and Chile ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.