Armenia vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Armenia
0.0001 people per person
in 2024
Vietnam
0 people per person
in 2024
Armenia rank
100th
Vietnam rank
103rd
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Armenia
- Vietnam
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Vietnam ahead.
Armenia ranks 100th and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 people per person | 0.1187 people per person | 0.1186 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2010s | 0.0001 people per person | 0.0473 people per person | 0.0471 people per person | Vietnam |
| 2020s | 0.0001 people per person | 0.004 people per person | 0.0039 people per person | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Armenia or Vietnam?
- Armenia, at 0.0001 people per person against 0 people per person in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Armenia and Vietnam?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Vietnam?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Armenia ranks 100th and Vietnam ranks 103rd of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.