Argentina vs Guatemala: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita
Argentina
0.0066 people per person
in 2014
Guatemala
0.0065 people per person
in 2024
Argentina rank
72nd
Guatemala rank
74th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita over time
- Argentina
- Guatemala
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 0.0066 people per person against 0.0065 people per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0001 people per person.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 74th of 171 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0073 people per person | 0.0772 people per person | 0.0699 people per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0.0068 people per person | 0.0567 people per person | 0.0499 people per person | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita, Argentina or Guatemala?
- Argentina, at 0.0066 people per person against 0.0065 people per person in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita between Argentina and Guatemala?
- 0.0001 people per person, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Guatemala?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Argentina and Guatemala rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita?
- Argentina ranks 72nd and Guatemala ranks 74th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.