Oman vs Vietnam: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Vietnam
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Oman rank
105th
Vietnam rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate over time
- Oman
- Vietnam
How they compare
Oman currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Vietnam, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 105th and Vietnam ranks 105th of 136 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.74 % change on previous year | -5.33 % change on previous year | 1.41 % change on previous year | Vietnam |
| 2010s | -47.25 % change on previous year | -8.94 % change on previous year | 38.32 % change on previous year | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate, Oman or Vietnam?
- Oman, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Vietnam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate between Oman and Vietnam?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Vietnam?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Oman and Vietnam rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Oman ranks 105th and Vietnam ranks 105th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.