Oman vs Uruguay: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2020
Oman rank
105th
Uruguay rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate over time
- Oman
- Uruguay
How they compare
Oman currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 136 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.74 % change on previous year | -7.92 % change on previous year | 1.18 % change on previous year | Oman |
| 2010s | -47.25 % change on previous year | -14.38 % change on previous year | 32.87 % change on previous year | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate, Oman or Uruguay?
- Oman, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate between Oman and Uruguay?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uruguay?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Oman and Uruguay rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Oman ranks 105th and Uruguay ranks 105th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.