Greece vs Nepal: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate
Greece
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Nepal
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Greece rank
105th
Nepal rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate over time
- Greece
- Nepal
How they compare
Greece currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 105th of 136 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.46 % change on previous year | -4.4 % change on previous year | 5.06 % change on previous year | Nepal |
| 2010s | -41.04 % change on previous year | -9.16 % change on previous year | 31.88 % change on previous year | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate, Greece or Nepal?
- Greece, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2017.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate between Greece and Nepal?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Nepal?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
- How do Greece and Nepal rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Greece ranks 105th and Nepal ranks 105th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.