Egypt vs Oman: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate
Egypt
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Egypt rank
105th
Oman rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate over time
- Egypt
- Oman
How they compare
Egypt currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Egypt ranks 105th and Oman ranks 105th of 136 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -5.64 % change on previous year | -6.74 % change on previous year | 1.1 % change on previous year | Egypt |
| 2010s | -12.29 % change on previous year | -47.25 % change on previous year | 34.96 % change on previous year | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate, Egypt or Oman?
- Egypt, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman as of 2019.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate between Egypt and Oman?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Oman?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Egypt and Oman rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Egypt ranks 105th and Oman ranks 105th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.