Chile vs Iraq: Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate
Chile
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Iraq
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Chile rank
105th
Iraq rank
105th
Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate over time
- Chile
- Iraq
How they compare
Chile currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 105th and Iraq ranks 105th of 136 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 % change on previous year | -6.68 % change on previous year | 9.31 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.61 % change on previous year | -41.19 % change on previous year | 43.8 % change on previous year | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate, Chile or Iraq?
- Chile, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Iraq as of 2021.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate between Chile and Iraq?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iraq?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Iraq rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 105th and Iraq ranks 105th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage in rural areas. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.