Greece vs Sri Lanka: Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate
Greece
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Sri Lanka
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
Greece rank
133rd
Sri Lanka rank
133rd
Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate over time
- Greece
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Greece currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 133rd and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 160 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -9.02 % change on previous year | -5.65 % change on previous year | 3.37 % change on previous year | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | -40.7 % change on previous year | -14.21 % change on previous year | 26.5 % change on previous year | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate, Greece or Sri Lanka?
- Greece, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2017.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate between Greece and Sri Lanka?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2017.
- How do Greece and Sri Lanka rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate?
- Greece ranks 133rd and Sri Lanka ranks 133rd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.