Brazil vs Oman: Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate
Brazil
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Oman
-100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Brazil rank
133rd
Oman rank
133rd
Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate over time
- Brazil
- Oman
How they compare
Brazil currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Oman ahead.
Brazil ranks 133rd and Oman ranks 133rd of 160 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.31 % change on previous year | -6.5 % change on previous year | 0.1897 % change on previous year | Brazil |
| 2010s | -10.74 % change on previous year | -45.96 % change on previous year | 35.22 % change on previous year | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate, Brazil or Oman?
- Brazil, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Oman as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate between Brazil and Oman?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Oman?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Oman rank globally for sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate?
- Brazil ranks 133rd and Oman ranks 133rd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sanitation facilities usage, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Sanitation facilities usage. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.