ARG vs IRN: Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas
ARG
0 people
in 2024
IRN
0 people
in 2024
ARG rank
97th
IRN rank
97th
Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas over time
- ARG
- IRN
How they compare
ARG currently reports 0 people against 0 people in IRN, a difference of 0 people.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was ARG ahead.
ARG ranks 97th and IRN ranks 97th of 186 countries.
ARG has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | ARG | IRN | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 522,398 people | 17,491 people | 504,906 people | ARG |
| 2010s | 359,659 people | 17,181 people | 342,478 people | ARG |
| 2020s | 47,952 people | 0 people | 47,952 people | ARG |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sanitation facilities usage in urban areas, ARG or IRN?
- ARG, at 0 people against 0 people in IRN as of 2024.
- What is the difference in sanitation facilities usage in urban areas between ARG and IRN?
- 0 people, with ARG ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for ARG and IRN?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do ARG and IRN rank globally for sanitation facilities usage in urban areas?
- ARG ranks 97th and IRN ranks 97th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Sanitation facilities usage in urban areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Open defecation includes defecating in fields, forests, bushes, bodies of water or other open spaces, not using any sanitation facilities.