Which has higher sample size, Jordan or South Africa?

South Africa, at 146,461 against 143,366 in Jordan as of 2020.

What is the difference in sample size between Jordan and South Africa?

3,095, with South Africa ahead.

8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.

The World Bank, published as Sample size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jordan

143,366

in 2016

South Africa

146,461

in 2020

Jordan rank

16th

South Africa rank

15th

South Africa currently reports 146,461 against 143,366 in Jordan, a difference of 3,095.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 15th of 80 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Decade	Jordan	South Africa	Difference	Ahead
2000s	162,596	215,366	52,770	South Africa
2010s	146,730	227,452	80,722	South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Which has higher sample size, Jordan or South Africa?: South Africa, at 146,461 against 143,366 in Jordan as of 2020.
What is the difference in sample size between Jordan and South Africa?: 3,095, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and South Africa?: 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
How do Jordan and South Africa rank globally for sample size?: Jordan ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 15th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Sample size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.