Which has higher sample size, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?

Sri Lanka, at 67,088 against 46,880 in Ecuador as of 2016.

How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?

13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.

The World Bank, published as Sample size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador

46,880

in 2020

Sri Lanka

67,088

in 2016

Ecuador rank

28th

Sri Lanka rank

25th

Sri Lanka currently reports 67,088 against 46,880 in Ecuador, a difference of 20,208.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.4 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Ecuador ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 80 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Decade	Ecuador	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
2000s	51,952	54,353	2,401	Sri Lanka
2010s	66,767	56,106	10,661	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Which has higher sample size, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?: Sri Lanka, at 67,088 against 46,880 in Ecuador as of 2016.
What is the difference in sample size between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?: 20,208, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?: 13 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2016.
How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for sample size?: Ecuador ranks 28th and Sri Lanka ranks 25th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Sample size. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.