Hungary vs Latvia: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal

Hungary
0 Unspecified
in 2026
Latvia
0 Unspecified
in 2026
Hungary rank
9th
Latvia rank
9th

Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal over time

  • Hungary
  • Latvia
00.20.40.60.81199720112026

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Latvia, a difference of 0 Unspecified.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Hungary ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 9th of 30 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 Unspecified 0 Unspecified 0 Unspecified —
2000s 0.1 Unspecified 0.3 Unspecified 0.2 Unspecified Latvia
2010s 0.1 Unspecified 0.2 Unspecified 0.1 Unspecified Latvia
2020s 0 Unspecified 0.2857 Unspecified 0.2857 Unspecified Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal, Hungary or Latvia?
Hungary, at 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Latvia as of 2026.
What is the difference in sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal between Hungary and Latvia?
0 Unspecified, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Latvia?
28 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2026.
How do Hungary and Latvia rank globally for sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal?
Hungary ranks 9th and Latvia ranks 9th of 30 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Latvia: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sahm-rule-recession-indicator-recession-signal/hungary/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/sahm-rule-recession-indicator-recession-signal/hungary/latvia-2/">Hungary vs Latvia: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal
Unit
Unspecified
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
32 places, 1,260 data points, 1955–2026
Last refreshed

The Sahm rule is a simple recession indicator based on increases in the unemployment rate. Originally developed for the United States, it is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by at least 0.5 percentage points above its lowest level in the previous year. To assess its usefulness beyond the United States, the OECD has calculated the Sahm indicator for OECD countries using monthly unemployment rates from the OECD Labour Force Surveys and replaced the fixed U.S. threshold with country-specific thresholds. Under this approach, the indicator is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises above its country-specific threshold relative to its lowest level in the previous year. For more information please refer to Can we predict recessions using only unemployment data? Applying the Sahm rule to OECD countries.