Denmark vs Germany: Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal
Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal over time
- Denmark
- Germany
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Germany, a difference of 0 Unspecified.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Germany ahead.
Denmark ranks 9th and Germany ranks 9th of 30 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Germany in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.125 Unspecified | 0.375 Unspecified | 0.25 Unspecified | Germany |
| 2000s | 0.2 Unspecified | 0.2 Unspecified | 0 Unspecified | — |
| 2010s | 0.1 Unspecified | 0 Unspecified | 0.1 Unspecified | Denmark |
| 2020s | 0.5714 Unspecified | 0 Unspecified | 0.5714 Unspecified | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal, Denmark or Germany?
- Denmark, at 0 Unspecified against 0 Unspecified in Germany as of 2026.
- What is the difference in sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal between Denmark and Germany?
- 0 Unspecified, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2026.
- How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for sahm rule recession indicator — recession signal?
- Denmark ranks 9th and Germany ranks 9th of 30 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Sahm rule recession indicator — Recession signal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Sahm rule is a simple recession indicator based on increases in the unemployment rate. Originally developed for the United States, it is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises by at least 0.5 percentage points above its lowest level in the previous year. To assess its usefulness beyond the United States, the OECD has calculated the Sahm indicator for OECD countries using monthly unemployment rates from the OECD Labour Force Surveys and replaced the fixed U.S. threshold with country-specific thresholds. Under this approach, the indicator is triggered when the three-month average unemployment rate rises above its country-specific threshold relative to its lowest level in the previous year. For more information please refer to Can we predict recessions using only unemployment data? Applying the Sahm rule to OECD countries.